![amiga os 3.9 make iso amiga os 3.9 make iso](https://d4.alternativeto.net/-NOeJxE7ufAJg3OkBl_zLzxbPoev8Zh82u_zyWv5KwE/rs:fill:400:400:0/g:ce:0:0/YWJzOi8vZGlzdC9zL2FtaWdhb3MtMy05XzUwNzQxM19mdWxsLnBuZw.jpg)
- #Amiga os 3.9 make iso mods#
- #Amiga os 3.9 make iso plus#
- #Amiga os 3.9 make iso mac#
- #Amiga os 3.9 make iso windows#
But it will often warm reboot faster than Windows seems to close a crashed program, and unlike Windows XP will not be zomibified by simply connecting to the Internet. It is a major release of a minor OS, therefore it is News, at least to a OS based news forum.ġ: No one said AmigaOS was seriously stable, well in fact it is, but dodgy programs will crash it out, which is a little err. It’s not from Amiga Inc, it’s from Hyperion. This is another crap marketing campaign by Amiga Inc., very sad OSNews publish this… What means “The Final Update”‘ phrase? Does this is the really promissed final version of AmigaOS 4.0 or another stupid marketing phrase for blind name followers? I see MorphOS a lot more feature-rich in general than AmigaOS4 at this moment, maybe MorphOS 1.5 will surpass that a lot more (I don’t believe it will appear but I’ve seen more strange stuff to occour).Ĥ. Even homebrew projects like Haiku are progressing a lot faster than AmigaOS4. Feature-Rich: it can be more feature-rich than an average AmigaOS, but not more than most really modern operating systems. It’s still outdated compared to most modern operating systems in terms of applications, hardware support and features.ģ.
![amiga os 3.9 make iso amiga os 3.9 make iso](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/P_zVRIfgywY/maxresdefault.jpg)
It can be modern, but it’s quite old compared to the revolution the original AmigaOS was in the past. More stable than original AmigaOS from CBM? Are you kidding? I’ve seen OS4 crashing even a lot more than Windows XP on certain machines with security “problems”.Ģ.
![amiga os 3.9 make iso amiga os 3.9 make iso](https://wiki.amigaos.net/w/images/9/94/WorkbenchFig4-3.png)
This post is a note from a marketing guy of Amiga Inc., It’s very wrong see this is posted like news, it’s not an objective note.ġ. Having said all that, I wish Amiga OS with it’s light weight, fast context switching and so on all the best… Maybe it will take off as a set-top box.
#Amiga os 3.9 make iso mac#
Yes, I know WIndows is tied to x86 and OS X is tied to Mac h/w, but as Amiga 4.0 was starting from scratch, they had the chance to break that mould… I think any chance DE had is pretty much disolved now sadly… I also remember thinking that DE was the way to go, not an OS tied to a specific platform. I remember how many bugs it had but also saw its potential too. I was waiting for this over 2 years ago now when I took a trip to Melbourne to see a demo of it. “Should there be a grammar checker on OSNews? I am not picky and English is not my first language, but still…”īy the way, congratulations Amiga, good to see you finally get 4.0 out there. “Should there not be a grammar checker on OSNews? I am not picky and English is not my first language, but still…”Īnother interesting thing with English is that if you take the word “not” out of this sentence, it is still valid… One thing I never quite got with English, should there be a comma after the word “picky” as the word “and” is a joining word? Hell half the time I boot up uae just to play with the AmigaOS. There is the amiwm, but it doesn’t quite do it justice either. I’ve tried several times to make my Gnome desktop more Amiga like, but it doesn’t quite make it. They make it much smoother than Windows XP.
#Amiga os 3.9 make iso mods#
Especially after you add in some of the third party mods like magic menu, mUI etc. The 2.x and above versions of it were simply works of art. There are still many capabilities that still are not comparable in modern day operating systems. It was very much a innovative and very usable operating system.
#Amiga os 3.9 make iso plus#
I could be wrong about this, but I think AmigaOS was the first to have color icons, plus it had the drop-down screens, etc. Even Workbench 1.3 was better looking, at least it had a default color of blue instead of green (never could figure that one out, GREEN?) TOS was more of a wannabe Unix underbelly of the Atari Operating System, GEM was the actual GUI.) I completely agree with you though, it was pretty ugly. I used GEM (which is the actual GUI of the Atari ST.